CoD

You are an expert market‑research analyst tasked with creating a concise, information‑dense executive summary of a 30‑page market research report.

**Task**
1. Produce an initial brief, sparse summary that captures the core findings, key metrics, and primary conclusions of the report.
2. Using the same word count as the first draft, rewrite the summary to increase information density, prioritizing the most critical insights while preserving the overall length.
3. Incorporate relevant market‑research concepts (e.g., Jobs‑to‑Be‑Done, research design choices, segmentation approaches, preference measurement, customer‑journey mapping, market‑sizing methods) where they naturally support the summarized content.

**Audience**: [AUDIENCE: specify who will read the executive summary – e.g., senior leadership, product team, investors]
**Purpose**: [PURPOSE: state the intended use of the summary – e.g., strategic decision‑making, investment pitch, product roadmap]
**Key Focus Areas** (if any): [FOCUS: list any particular sections or topics that must be emphasized – e.g., competitive landscape, consumer preferences, growth forecasts]

**Output**
- A single paragraph of approximately **200 words** (the same length for both drafts).
- The first paragraph is the sparse version; the second paragraph is the densified version.
- Present the two versions consecutively, clearly labeled “Initial Summary 1” and “Summary 2”.

**Quality Criteria**
1. Accuracy: all facts must reflect the source report; indicate any approximations.
2. Relevance: only include insights that directly support the stated purpose and audience.
3. Clarity: use plain language while correctly applying technical terms, defining them on first use.

**Boundary**
Do not add new data or speculative conclusions beyond what the original report contains.

If any of the placeholders above are unknown, state your assumptions and ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

Before writing the final answer, work through the problem step by step and weigh the main trade-offs; present only the reasoned conclusion, not your working notes.

You are an expert technical summarizer.
Your task is to transform a lengthy technical RFC into a concise brief that retains all essential information.

1. Read the provided RFC text.
2. Produce an initial sparse summary that captures the core purpose, key specifications, and major implications in roughly the same length as the final brief.
3. Rewrite this summary to increase information density while keeping the word count unchanged, prioritizing the most critical details.
4. Perform a second rewrite following the same constraints, further tightening the language without sacrificing meaning.

The final output must be a single paragraph of exactly **[TARGET WORD COUNT]** words, written for **[AUDIENCE]**.

**Quality criteria**:
- Accuracy: all major technical points from the RFC are present and correctly represented.
- Brevity: no superfluous wording; each sentence contributes essential information.
- Clarity: terminology is precise yet understandable to the specified audience.

If any required details (e.g., the RFC content, audience characteristics, or desired word count) are missing, state your assumptions and ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

You are an expert summarizer tasked with condensing a two‑hour meeting transcript into a concise, information‑dense summary.

The summary must be produced in three iterative passes, each pass rewriting the previous version to increase density while keeping the overall length constant. The final output should retain all critical points, decisions, and action items from the meeting.

**Audience:** [AUDIENCE: specify who will read the summary, e.g., senior leadership, project team, external stakeholder]
**Desired length:** [WORD COUNT: indicate the target word count for the final summary, e.g., 250 words]
**Format:** plain text paragraph(s) without headings; include a brief bullet list of action items at the end (no more than 5 items).

**Process:**
1. Produce an initial sparse summary that captures the main topics and speaker contributions, adhering to the target word count.
2. Rewrite the summary to be more information‑dense, preserving the same word count, by prioritizing the most important details and eliminating redundancies.
3. Perform a final rewrite that further compresses the content while still meeting the word‑count target, ensuring that key decisions and next steps are unmistakably clear.

**Quality criteria:**
- Accuracy: all factual statements must reflect the transcript.
- Completeness: every major decision and assigned action must be included.
- Clarity: the final summary should be easy to read and understand without additional context.

**Boundary:** Do not add any speculative content or information not present in the transcript. If any required detail is missing, note it briefly in brackets.

You are a research‑communication specialist tasked with transforming a scholarly article into a concise, non‑technical abstract.

Your work proceeds in three iterative passes, each maintaining the same overall length while increasing information density:

1. **Initial condensation** – read the full paper and produce a brief, sparse summary that captures the core purpose, methods, primary results, and overall significance in plain language.
2. **Focused enrichment** – rewrite the summary, adding essential details that a non‑specialist needs to understand the study’s contribution, while keeping the word count unchanged.
3. **Final densification** – refine the text to maximize clarity and impact, prioritizing the most critical information and eliminating any remaining redundancies, still within the same length.

**Deliverable:** a single abstract of exactly **[TARGET_ABSTRACT_LENGTH] words** that a lay audience can read and grasp without specialist background.

**Quality criteria:**
- Uses clear, jargon‑free language while briefly defining any unavoidable technical terms.
- Accurately reflects the study’s objectives, methodology, key findings, and implications.
- Maintains logical flow and readability for non‑experts.

**Boundary:** Do not include detailed methodological tables, statistical formulas, or citations; focus solely on narrative explanation.

If any aspect of the request is unclear—such as the paper’s title, research field, or desired abstract length—state your assumptions and ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

Before writing the final answer, work through the problem step by step and weigh the main trade-offs; present only the reasoned conclusion, not your working notes.

You are an expert summarizer tasked with distilling a full year of customer feedback into a concise, information‑dense summary.

Your work will proceed in three passes, each producing a summary of the same length but increasingly dense with the most critical insights.

**Audience:** [AUDIENCE: who will read the summary, e.g., senior leadership, product team, marketing]
**Desired length:** [WORD COUNT: target number of words for each pass, e.g., 250]
**Key focus areas (if any):** [FOCUS AREAS: specific topics or metrics the user wants highlighted, e.g., satisfaction trends, recurring complaints]

**Process:**
1. Create an initial “sparse” version that captures all major themes and notable quotes, staying within the target word count.
2. Rewrite the same‑length summary, removing redundancies and emphasizing the most impactful points.
3. Produce a final, highly dense version that retains the essential insights while maximizing information per word, again respecting the same word count.

**Output format:**
- Pass 1: Sparse summary – plain paragraph.
- Pass 2: Refined summary – plain paragraph.
- Pass 3: Dense summary – plain paragraph.

**Quality criteria:**
- Accurately reflects the full range of feedback.
- Prioritizes insights that affect decision‑making.
- Uses clear, professional language without jargon unless necessary, defining any technical terms on first use.

If any of the placeholders above are unknown, state your assumptions explicitly and ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

You are a legal summarization specialist.
Your task is to transform a lengthy commercial contract into a concise list of its essential terms, preserving all critical obligations, rights, and conditions while keeping the overall length unchanged.

1. Produce an initial brief summary that captures the main parties, purpose, and scope of the agreement.
2. Refine this summary by iteratively rewriting it to increase information density, each pass retaining the same word count but prioritizing the most important clauses (payment, deliverables, term, termination, liability, confidentiality, governing law, dispute resolution, etc.).

Deliver the final output as a plain‑text bullet list, each bullet no longer than **[MAX_BULLET_LENGTH]: specify the maximum characters per bullet**. The entire list should not exceed **[TOTAL_WORD_LIMIT]: specify total word count**.

Quality criteria:
- **Accuracy**: all key contractual provisions must be correctly represented.
- **Completeness**: no major obligation or right is omitted.
- **Conciseness**: language is tight, avoiding unnecessary filler.

Exclude any full legal clauses or boilerplate text; focus only on the distilled terms.

If any essential details are missing, state your first assumption and then ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

Write this for [AUDIENCE: who will read the output, and how much they already know]. Match the depth, vocabulary and examples to that reader.

You are a business analyst specializing in concise executive summaries.
Your task is to create a two‑stage summary of the annual report for **[COMPETITOR NAME]**.

1. Produce an initial brief that captures the report’s main sections (financial performance, strategic initiatives, market outlook, risks) in a sparse style, using only the most essential points.
2. Rewrite that brief to be more information‑dense while keeping the total length exactly **[WORD COUNT]** words, prioritizing the facts that matter most to **[TARGET AUDIENCE]**.

Deliver the final dense summary as a single paragraph of the specified word count.
Quality criteria:
- Accuracy: all stated figures and statements must reflect the source report.
- Relevance: include only information that a senior decision‑maker would need.
- Clarity: language should be precise, avoiding unnecessary filler.

Exclude any speculative commentary, marketing language, or unrelated company details.

If any of the placeholders above are unknown, state your assumption and proceed, or ask up to three clarifying questions before completing the task.

You are a concise technical writer tasked with compressing a lengthy incident post‑mortem into a highly information‑dense summary while preserving all critical details.

The summary must be crafted in three iterative passes:

1. Produce an initial sparse version that captures the core narrative and main findings in roughly the same length as the original.
2. Rewrite the version to increase information density, eliminating any redundancy and tightening language, while keeping the overall length unchanged.
3. Refine the text again to achieve maximum compactness, ensuring every sentence conveys essential insight and no important fact is omitted, still respecting the original length constraint.

The final output should be a single paragraph of approximately **[WORD COUNT]: specify the target word count for the compressed summary**.

Write in a clear, professional tone suitable for **[AUDIENCE]: e.g., engineering leadership, incident response team, or executive stakeholders**.

**Quality criteria:**
- All key incident details (timeline, root cause, impact, remediation steps, and lessons learned) are present.
- Language is precise, jargon‑appropriate for the audience, and free of unnecessary filler.
- The three‑pass process is evident in the progression of the text, showing increasing density without changing length.

**Boundary:** Do not include any speculative information beyond what is provided in the original post‑mortem. If any required detail is missing, state the assumption clearly before proceeding.

You are a concise content specialist tasked with creating a multi‑stage written summary of a long podcast episode.

The episode’s **topic** is: [TOPIC: brief description of the podcast subject].
Its **duration** is: [DURATION: total length in minutes].
The intended **reader** is: [AUDIENCE: who will read the summary, e.g., executives, students, general public].
The final summary should be **approximately**: [FINAL WORD COUNT: target length in words, e.g., 200].

**Task workflow**
1. Produce an initial sparse summary that captures the core narrative and main points, using roughly the same word count as the final target length.
2. Rewrite the summary, increasing information density while preserving the same word count, prioritizing the most critical details.
3. Perform a third rewrite that further compresses the content, again keeping the word count constant, to achieve maximal density without losing essential meaning.

**Output format**
- Three separate sections titled “Stage 1 – Sparse Summary,” “Stage 2 – Denser Summary,” and “Stage 3 – Maximal Density.”
- Each section must contain exactly the target word count (±5 words).
- Use clear, plain language; define any technical term on first use.

**Quality criteria**
- Accuracy: all key facts and arguments from the episode are correctly represented.
- Coherence: each version reads smoothly and logically despite compression.
- Brevity: no unnecessary filler or repetition.

If any of the placeholders above are unknown, state your assumptions explicitly and ask up to three clarifying questions before proceeding.

You are a professional summarizer tasked with transforming a full policy document into a concise one‑page brief.

Your audience is [AUDIENCE: specify the primary readers, e.g., senior executives, compliance officers, staff]. The policy’s subject matter is [TOPIC: describe the main focus of the policy, e.g., data privacy, workplace safety]. The original document’s length is [ORIGINAL LENGTH: indicate approximate word or page count].

**Task**
1. Produce an initial sparse summary of the policy that captures all major sections and core points, limited to roughly 300–350 words (the length of one printed page).
2. Rewrite that summary to increase information density while keeping the same word count, ensuring that only the most critical details remain and any redundancies are removed.
3. Deliver the final dense one‑page version.

**Output format**
- Plain text, 300–350 words total.
- Begin with a brief heading that names the policy and its purpose.
- Follow with a concise paragraph for each major section (e.g., Scope, Responsibilities, Procedures, Enforcement).

**Quality criteria**
- Accuracy: all essential policy elements are retained.
- Clarity: language is clear and jargon‑free for the specified audience.
- Brevity: no unnecessary filler; each sentence adds substantive value.

**Boundary**
Do not include any examples, anecdotes, or background history that are not part of the core policy content.

If any of the placeholders above are unknown, state your assumption and proceed, or ask up to three clarifying questions before completing the summary.